Real Transformation, Real Results
Stories from the ground floor to the boardroom that shaped our platforms
Stories from the ground floor to the boardroom that shaped our platforms
We’ve never been ‘ivory tower’ consultants. You’ll find our teams in branches and contact centres alongside customer-facing staff, finding out what really happens when people apply for credit cards and finance or buy insurance. Or we’ll be on the shop floor of a factory talking to people on the production line to find out how things are working for (or against) them and spotting ways to radically improve efficiency and productivity.
It’s only by understanding every step of a customer interaction, or the nuts and bolts of a production process, that you can change things. And you can’t do that by staying in your office.
These are some of the customer stories that shaped the design of our platforms.
All our customer stories are told anonymously to protect our clients’ identities.
See how Cenkusha helps organizations reduce waste, align teams and deliver exceptional customer outcomes continuously.
A global manufacturer in the automotive sector appointed HENKA to improve productivity at one of their facilities. Observations showed that manufacturing process for each unit took six hours in total. Each team of ten people should produce ten to 12 units a day. In this factory, each team was producing the equivalent of one unit per day. So, what was going wrong?
The factory layout was extremely poorly designed. Every station had 15-20 days-worth of inventory, there was no sense of urgency and there were no clear targets for production, people just did what they could and kept themselves busy. No-one on the production line had a sense of the customer or what order they were working on, they just worked on their inventory, in their silo, unaware of the bigger picture. Another part of the problem was the lack of quality checks which meant parts were frequently being returned to the previous station to fix, slowing the whole process down.
We asked to close the factory for three days. This was a lot to ask and raised natural concerns about the impact on productivity, but the client trusted us and went ahead with the temporary closure. We took everything out of the factory and into a warehouse next door.
Then we implemented a new factory layout and system. By bringing in only the inventory required for that day it was immediately clear to see how each station was progressing. We could also see who was waiting for the previous station to finish and which stations had additional capacity. We could clearly see how work was progressing by seeing how much inventory was remaining at each station and each person knew how much more they had to get done that day to meet their targets. Work was focused and scheduled and longer simply expanded to fill the time available.
Within weeks, production had increased tenfold from 1.2 units per day to 12 units.
Full visibility of how work flows - from the beginning right through to the end of a process - enables you to make improvements. If you can't see the bottlenecks and the hold-ups you can't make effective change. In this factory we were able to redesign production so that everyone could see how work was flowing and where the constraints were making them easier to fix. It's the same in any organisation, even with digital processes you need to be able to see how each stage of the process works in order to improve things (which is why we designed C1 and C2).
Even if everyone is meeting their individual targets, if the process as a whole doesn't flow then productivity will be impacted and customer targets will not be achieved. This is not the fault of the employee, they do their tasks, it's up to the leadership team to redefine end-to-end processes and share customer-focused goals.
Whether it's a factory, a customer contact centre, a retail branch or an office, you have to walk the floor to see how things actually work in reality. Go there and spend time seeing for yourself how things work on a day-to-day basis, it's the only way to fully understand each stage of the process.
It’s early Friday morning and all the hotel staff are in their daily briefing. Occupancy is at 80% so it’s going to be a busy weekend. Several VIP guests will be staying. There is an AC complaint in room 412. Another guest is arriving who has a bad back and needs a special mattress. How is the kitchen doing – do they have enough eggs?
This daily briefing keeps everyone focused and on point, it’s a brilliant way of engaging a team and encouraging them to plan in detail for today and tomorrow, adapting to the constantly shifting demands in hospitality. Flexible, reactive and a great way of sustaining excellent, customer-focused service.
We were brought in by this global hospitality group to improve their procurement processes. It currently took six months to onboard a new supplier which, for a dynamic and responsive hospitality group, was far too slow. The procurement process didn’t reflect their culture of continuous improvement so we redesigned it for them so they were better able to respond to new trends and flex their offering around customer demand. It was the first of three engagements we’ve undertaken for this group and we look forward to more!
The daily briefing wasn’t a pointless status update (common in corporate environments), it was a dynamic, engaging, real-time customer-focused update that enabled the teams to do their jobs better by understanding customer requirements. Translate this into any business environment.
In this instance, their procurement processes were preventing the client from being able to respond to changes in customer demand quickly enough to maintain their competitive edge. Their quest for continuous improvement enabled them to recognise that this constraint didn’t align with their customer-focused values and needed to change.
What data are you working with? Is it from yesterday? A month ago? Longer? You need real-time information if you’re going to be truly responsive. This hotel group gives its staff real-time information so they can meet the demands of today’s customer, it doesn’t base its management briefings on last week because it’s a completely different set of customers. It’s a great lesson on the importance of real-time data.
With green lights across its internal scorecard, meaning everyone was hitting their targets and everything was running ‘as it should’, this global bank needed to understand why its customer ratings were the lowest of all its competitors. This organisation had spent millions of dollars digitising processes, but the return on investment was poor and customer feedback was extremely negative. They were the slowest in the market, inefficient and expensive. They asked us to help find out what was going wrong.
We examined four specific customer processes relating to financing trade across multiple markets. We also spoke to around 30 customers in different markets face-to-face. Some of these organisations had been clients of this bank for over 20 years but no-one had ever asked them about their experiences. They may have enjoyed corporate hospitality, but no-one asked them about the service they were receiving.
Then we mapped each of the four processes from end to end, identifying where things were delayed, asking why requests were sent back and forth, finding the inefficiencies. Each element of these processes was delivered by a different team who handed off to the next team and considered their work complete. No-one followed up to see if the work they had handed off was sitting there for three weeks. No-one had oversight of the entire process which pinged back and forth across multiple countries, visiting one particular city four times.
Often organisations outsource or create teams in low-cost economies because they think it will improve productivity. Sometimes it works, in this case it ended up costing the bank more time, more money and was a major factor in why the whole process was so extraordinarily inefficient.
We redesigned the entire process and reduced the time for each of the four processes by 80%. From the customer perspective, productivity more than doubled. After the success of the initial project, we were given the mandate to replicate this work across the trade business for the whole bank. Purely in terms of efficiency and improvements this work generated a USD$50M benefit to them, not including the revenue increase. Customer feedback was transformed from worst to ‘best ever’ and their own benchmarking showed they were beating all of their regional competitors.
At this bank, all the teams were hitting their targets but because those targets were disconnected from the customer experience, these KPIs didn’t tell the bank anything about how well they were doing from the customer’s perspective.
Each individual team may be performing perfectly adequately but if the processes are not joined up and each stage is performed in isolation, bottlenecks and logjams occur that no-one is aware of. Visibility and ownership of the entire process is vital.
This bank had spent millions on digitising and automating processes that weren’t serving the customer, throwing good money after bad. Every organisation needs to take a long hard look at all of its processes and weed out any waste before spending money on automation.
In the highly competitive world of corporate banking, the speed at which accounts are set up and opened is a key indicator of efficiency, responsiveness and customer service. If the account opening process is complicated and slow, it creates a poor first impression and sets the bank’s reputation in the customer’s mind.
A global bank had a huge backlog of applications which development corporate account openings were taking anything from two weeks to a month. When we analysed the process we could see that every customer was being asked to provide proof of address, proof of identity etc. even if they were an existing customer of the bank. It took the same amount of time for customers to open a second account as it did their first. This meant there was no benefit to being an existing customer and no reward to loyalty which led to poor customer satisfaction ratings.
After mapping the value stream for the entire process, analysing the hand-offs, understanding the customer journey and their experience, we redesigned the whole process putting the customer experience at its heart. Post-implementation, across seven markets in Asia, this bank’s corporate account opening was the fastest in the world.
There was no value in asking existing customers for proof of identity for a second time (but of course, proving who they were remained an essential step!), but because no-one had oversight of each element of the account opening process, no-one could see this unnecessary duplication. Mapping and understanding each step of the process enabled the client to see for the first time what was causing the bottlenecks.
It doesn’t take much to permanently damage a reputation and treating loyal customers like someone you’ve never met risks moving them from ‘net promoter’ to ‘detractor’. It’s vital to put yourself in the customer’s shoes and ask how you would feel if an organisation treated you like this.
The customer’s experience is everything, so processes should be designed through a customer value lens rather than to meet internal metrics or KPIs. Many organisations meet the KPIs they have set themselves but have poor customer ratings because they are internally focused rather than customer focused.
After a series of new product launches that had failed to move the needle on customer satisfaction or deliver a significant ROI, a large health insurance provider asked us for help to develop a new cashless hospitalisation product. This new policy would be used when the customer needed to stay in hospital and, rather than pay the bill and reclaim it from their insurer, the invoice would be sent direct to the insurer by the hospital. The target for this product was for a USD $100m ROI.
We looked at the process for new product development and it was chaotic, bouncing between different teams multiple times and every time a small change was made it had to be reapproved by every single team so it took 12-18 months to finalise. Throughout this complex process, no-one was actually talking to the customers to find out whether these new products were something they wanted, so it was perhaps unsurprising that their efforts at innovation were failing to hit the mark both financially and in terms of customer satisfaction.
We talked to customers and the insurance company’s customer-facing agents and found out that one of the key measures for deciding whether to buy this type of policy was how many days in hospital it covered. Most policies offered three days. The data told us that 99.9% of this company’s policyholders’ hospital stays were less than three days, so we suggested that the policy should offer five days to make it appealing and competitive by providing coverage that no other insurer did at the time and be highly differentiated.
When talking to customers it became obvious that no-one stays in hospital a moment longer than they have to; it’s not a hotel, and most people just want to get home where it’s easier to rest and recover. The data backed this up showing that almost all hospital stays were under three days. The CEO was extremely nervous but trusted our analysis and rationale and a month later the product was approved.
One year after its launch, this product had the highest market share in its category.For the first time ever, a new product delivered on its financial target and the company’s NPS score went through the roof.We then added little touches to premium customers like sending flowers and a card from the insurance agent who had sold them the policy – a small gesture but one that helped build customer loyalty.
If you develop new products in a vacuum and don’t go out and listen to what your customers want it’s more likely to fail. Listen to your customers and listen to your customer-facing staff because they will have valuable insights into what customers really want from your organisation.
This insurance company recognised that something needed to change, that their new products simply were not having the desired impact. Saying ‘this isn’t working, we need help and we need to change things’ takes courage and humility but it’s the only way to improve and succeed.
The fear of people actually staying in hospital for five days, with all the associated costs, was palpable and the idea of offering five days would never have been approved if we couldn’t show that it was vanishingly unlikely to happen. It felt like a huge leap outside an established ‘three days’ industry standard box, but we had the data that proved it was a safe risk to take. It was thinking outside the box but working within the risk constraints of the insurance industry. This was only possible because we had quality data to prove the point. It's vital that you have the right data to inform and illuminate your ideas.
See how Cenkusha helps organizations reduce waste, align teams and deliver exceptional customer outcomes continuously.